Click for our main menu

Who's Running Largo? Not the City Commission, Judging by Gerard Response

by Leo Coughlin

LARGO - Mayor Pat Gerard raised the question at the July 21 City Commission of who was basically running the city - the elected body or the staff.

She accused City Manager Mac Craig of "Making us (the City Commission) look like idiots."

What prompted that was the signs placed at city parks that triggered an outburst of outrage from citizens.

Gerard was clearly seething with anger at the July 21 meeting and demanded to know who had placed or had ordered the signs to be placed.

Craig said, "We'll find out."

Who's running Largo?

The answer came late Tuesday.

It is not Gerard and most likely not the commission that she heads.

An opportunity for Craig to reveal his findings came at last week's commission meeting. Nothing was forthcoming. No member of the commission asked the question.

Commission members, queried Monday as to why they did not ask the question last week, refused to answer - except Gerard.

And this was her answer late Tuesday, in writing -

"I have spoken with Mr. Craig about the signs. He has said he does not know who put the signs up. The issue is closed for me."

There you have it. Craig reigns supreme in Largo. Elected officials come in second or somewhere down the line.

Gerard's docile surrendering to the power of Craig was in sharp contrast to her performance July 21 when she sharply admonished Craig and the city staff that they "had it backwards. We run the city," she said, referring to the commission.

That no longer appears to be the case, at least in her eyes.

Interestingly enough, the question of who put up the signs that evoked the citizen outcry, was asked of Craig and Joan Byrne, who runs the Parks and Recreation Department.

Their answers came last week and both lied.

The question to Craig -
"I note that at last week's City Commission meeting in answer to Mayor Gerard's serious question of who placed signs at the parks warning of them being closed, your response was, 'We'll find out.' What results have you come up with?"

His answer -
"The Parks personell (sic) did not place the signs. This was verified by the parks supervisor. If the city had placed the sign, it would not have said to call the listed phone number to express concern. The number listed was not city number. We do not know who placed the signs."

Actually, the number listed on the sign is a city number. It was called immediately upon receiving Craig's answer. A female voice answered. It said - "City of Largo. Recreation Division."

The question to Byrne -
"Did you direct that signs be posted at city parks warning that they may be closed due to budget constraints? Did the city manager, Mr. Craig, know that signs were to be posted or give any direction that they should or not be posted?"

Her answer -
"I did not direct signs to be installed and neither did Mr. Craig. Neither of us knew about any signs until they were mentioned in an email from a citizen at which time I instructed that any signs be removed."

Like Craig, Byrne apparently has a problem with the truth also. The signs were in evidence July 7 when the first citizen outburst occurred. They were still there the following Sunday, July 12.

On Monday, the following query was sent to Gerard and other commission members -

"At the July 21 City Commission meeting, City Manager Craig, in reference to the question of who placed signs at Bonner Park (particularly) and the Nature Preserve said, 'We'll find out.' No answer was volunteered at your commission meeting last week (August 4), two weeks later. Why didn't you ask him?"

Only Gerard responded and wrote this -
"I have spoken with Mr. Craig about the signs. He said he does not know who put the signs up. The issue is closed for me."

Lots of implications in that answer.

Craig seemed sure he knew last week that it was not any city personnel. Now he does not know. A mayor seething with anger and wanting answers three weeks ago is now a docile lamb.

Strange.

Included in Gerard's response was a request that e-mail not be sent to the address at which she received the query, although it is the very same address used by Shirley Frick, secretary to the commission, when she sends e-mail to individual members of the commission. Thus a public e-mail address.

So the concerns of citizens who wonder about how the city drifts, leaderless, and wonder who's in charge? who's guiding the city? received that answer this week.

And there have been challenges from citizens. As an example, City Hall received an e-mail this week from a citizen who raised the exact question that is on the minds of many.

The e-mail, from "Sam Carter," read, in part -
"Dear Commissioners: We find it hard to believe that what is reported in this week's Clearwater Gazette could possibly be true. (Leo) Coughlin claims that both the city manager and parks director gave him (and probably you) false information regarding the individual(s) who installed the 'park being closed' signs at Bonner and the Nature Center. According to Mr. Coughlin both of the aforementioned city employees claim to have no knowledge who did the deeds and worse the parks director claimed that the signs were removed immediately upon learning they were installed however, as reported, the signs were up for weeks. Are his reports accurate? If he is indeed reporting facts what are you planning on doing about it?"

Not much, obviously, if Gerard's answer Tuesday is taken as a guide.

Return to Home Page

Return to Current Edition

Contact us